ANIMAL RIGHTS IN ISLAM AND CHRISTIANITY: AN ANALYTICAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDY
Keywords:
Comparative, Animal Rights, Islam, Christianity, BibleAbstract
This analytical and comparative study aims to explore and analyze the perspectives on animal rights in Islam and Christianity, two of the world's major religions. The treatment of animals and their rights within religious frameworks is a topic of significant ethical, cultural, and social relevance. By examining the teachings, scriptures, and historical practices of Islam and Christianity, this research seeks to highlight the similarities and differences in their approaches to animal welfare and rights. The study begins with an overview of the beliefs and attitudes towards animals in both religions. Islamic teachings emphasize the importance of kindness and compassion towards all living beings, reflecting the concept of stewardship over the Earth. Christianity, on the other hand, often draws from the Biblical notion of human dominion over animals while also emphasizing themes of compassion and responsible stewardship.
The study will delve into historical and contemporary practices within Islamic and Christian societies, highlighting instances where adherence to or deviation from religious teachings has impacted the treatment of animals. Additionally, the role of religious leaders, scholars, and institutions in shaping attitudes towards animal rights will be examined. It will shed light on how these religions address the moral responsibilities of humans towards the non-human creatures they share the planet with, and how these perspectives have evolved over time. Ultimately, the findings of this research can facilitate discussions on fostering a more compassionate and responsible approach to animal welfare within religious contexts and beyond.
References
Al-Bukhari, Sahih. (n.d.). Chapter FazlSaqi Al-Mai, 2:833, Al-Raqam: In Al-Bukhari, Sahih, Kitab Al-Masqat (p. 2234).
Al-Hafiz Basheer Ahmad al Masri. (2007). Animal Welfare in Islam (1st ed., p. 100). The Islamic Foundation.
Andrew Linzey and Tom Regan. (2007). Animals and Christianity A Book of Readings (p. 49). Wipf and Stock.
Bukhari, I. (1957). Chapter An-Nahi an-Sabr al-Bhaim, 3:1549, Al-Raqam: 1957. In Muslim, Sahih, Kitab al-Saydwal-Zabaih (p. 1957). Sahih Muslim.
Charles Hartshorne. (1983). Insights and Oversights of Great Thinkers: An Evaluation of Western Philosophy (Suny Series in Systematic Philosophy) (Suny Philosophy) (p. 223). State University of New York Press; Reprint edition edition.
Finsen, L., & Finsen, S. (1994). The Animal Rights Movement in America. Macmillan Reference USA.
Forti, T. (2008). Animal imagery in the Book of Proverbs (1st ed., p. 84). Brill. (Original work published 2008)
Jean-Paul Sartre . (1946). Existentialism Is a Humanism. World Publishing Company . (Original work published 1989)
Kristen Still. (1984). Animal Welfare in Islamic Law (p. 13). Northwest University Press.
Melek Saral, & Şerif Onur Bahçecik. (2020). State, Religion and Muslims. BRILL.
Mo, D., Xunzi, & Han, F. (1967). Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. New York : Columbia University Press.
Morris, Richard Knowles and Michael W. Fox. (1978). On the Fifth Day: Animal Rights and Human Ethics (p. 236). USA.
Muhammad Sarwar. (2013a). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 115) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Muhammad Sarwar. (2013b). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 120) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Muhammad Sarwar. (2013c). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 124) [Ph.d. Thesis]. Minhaj University, Lahore.
Muhammad Sarwar. (2013d). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 124) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Sarwar, M. (2013a). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 124) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Sarwar, M. (2013b). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 126) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Sarwar, M. (2016). Animal Rights in Islam (p. 127) [Ph.d. Thesis].
Sunstain, Cass .R, and Martha c. (2004). Animal Rights: Current debates and new directions (p. 54). Oxford University Press.
VICENTE-ARCHE, A. R. (2001). The animal rights movement in the United States: some thoughts about a new ethics. REDEN: revista española de estudios norteamericanos, (21-32), 159-180.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.