FROM CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION TO CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY: ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT IN PAKISTAN

Authors

  • * Muhammad Farooq Sadiq School of Law and Policy, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan (Corresponding Author).
  • Khushbakht Qaiser Associate Professor School of Law and Policy, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Environmental Regulatory Enforcement; Corporate Accountability; Environmental Justice; PEPA 1997; Environmental Tribunals.

Abstract

Despite a comprehensive legal and policy environment to protect the environment, environmental regulatory enforcement is still a critical challenge in Pakistan. This article examines the implementation of corporate accountability and environmental justice in Pakistan through the lens of the state's environmental laws, policies, judicial rulings and institutional framework. It uses a qualitative approach with doctrinal legal research techniques and socio-legal interpretation with qualitative content analysis. Gaps in the enforcement of primary laws such as Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997 (PEPA 1997), Provincial Environmental laws, Environmental quality standards, provisions of environmental tribunals, policy documents and landmark judicial decisions were analyzed and gaps in the law to address accountability and enforcement were identified. The findings show that in Pakistan, while a comprehensive environmental legal structure exists, there is still a lack of practical implementation of these laws because of institutional fragmentation, limited monitoring capacity, procedural delays, weak penalties, and a lack of coordination between the federal, provincial and regulatory bodies. Corporate responsibility is legally recognized, for example, in terms of pollution control obligations, environmental impact assessment requirements, and liability provisions, but that these are not backed up by adequate compliance monitoring, transparency of reporting and effective sanctions. The courts have thus taken a progressive step in the promotion of environmental and climate justice but cannot replace the regular enforcement of the regulations. The article highlights the disconnect between environmental law and corporate accountability. It calls for stronger enforcement agencies and tribunals, strengthening corporate due diligence, raising penalties, providing for public participation, and linking environmental policies with enforceable implementation mechanisms.

DOI https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22283516

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahsan, I., & Khawaja, S. A. (2013). Development of environmental laws and jurisprudence in Pakistan. Asian Development Bank.

Akbar, K. F. (2023). Decentralization of environmental governance in Pakistan and its impact on sustainable development. Policy Perspectives, 20(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.13169/polipers.20.1.ra3

Asghar, A., Umer, M., & Afzal, A. (2024). Effective implementation of environmental laws in Pakistan. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(1), 9–14.

Asghar Leghari v. Federation of Pakistan, W.P. No. 25501/2015. Lahore High Court. (2015).

Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press.

Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braithwaite, J. (2011). The essence of responsive regulation. University of British Columbia Law Review, 44, 475–520.

Bullard, R. D. (2005). The quest for environmental justice: Human rights and the politics of pollution. Sierra Club Books.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Government of Pakistan. (1997). Pakistan Environmental Protection Act, 1997. Ministry of Law and Justice.

Government of Pakistan. (2022). National Hazardous Waste Management Policy 2022. Ministry of Climate Change.

Government of Pakistan. (2024). The Constitution (Twenty-Sixth Amendment) Act, 2024. Gazette of Pakistan.

Gunningham, N. (2017). Compliance, deterrence and beyond. In P. Drahos (Ed.), Regulatory theory: Foundations and applications (pp. 119–141). Australian National University Press.

Haider, A., Mathlouthi, N., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Beyond the books: Real world challenges in implementing environmental laws in Pakistan. SSRN.

Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119.

Khan, A. M. (2023). Brief on environmental legislation in Pakistan. Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

Khan, M. I., & Xu, Q. (2021). An assessment of environmental policy implications under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: A perspective of environmental laws and sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(20), Article 11223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011223

Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal research in law: Meaning, scope and methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 12(4), 559–563.

McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (Eds.). (2017). Research methods for law (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mirza, A. M. (2020). Environmental rights and case of climate justice in Pakistan. Strategic Studies, 40(2), 45–62.

Munir, M. W., & Ghouri, A. (2025). Environmental justice in Pakistan: Bridging international law and domestic implementation. In Pakistan and international law (pp. 224–257). Routledge.

Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE Publications.

Rapley, T. (2018). Doing conversation, discourse and document analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 378–392). SAGE Publications.

Salter, M., & Mason, J. (2007). Writing law dissertations: An introduction and guide to the conduct of legal research. Pearson Longman.

Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press.

Shabbir, S. S., Daavi, R. A., Khan, H., & Mehmood, M. I. (2024). Legal framework for promoting environmental justice in the context of climate change: Highlighting proactive role of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Shaikh, S. U. D., Mangi, R., & Abro, K. (2025). Legal strategies for addressing the environmental challenges: A pathway to sustainable governance in Pakistan. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 9(2), 53–66.

Shehla Zia v. WAPDA, PLD 1994 SC 693. Supreme Court of Pakistan. (1994).

Sial, S. A., Zaidi, S. M. A., & Taimour, S. (2018). Review of existing environmental laws and regulations in Pakistan. WWF-Pakistan.

Vranken, J. B. (2010). Methodology of legal doctrinal research. In M. van Hoecke (Ed.), Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline (pp. 111–121). Hart Publishing.

03 English Final Monthly June 2026 Vol 06 Issue 04 PIIJISS Citation Page

Downloads

Published

10-06-2026

How to Cite

Farooq Sadiq, M., & Khushbakht, Q. (2026). FROM CONSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION TO CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY: ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT IN PAKISTAN. PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences), 6(04), 16-26. https://pakistanislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/view/372