نماذج من التعقبات الخاصة بعزو الأحاديث لمصادر خارج الصحيحين في كتاب "فيض القدير شرح الجامع الصغير"

EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC CRITIQUES REGARDING THE ATTRIBUTION OF HADITHS TO SOURCES OUTSIDE THE TWO SAHIHS IN THE BOOK FAYḌ AL-QADĪR SHARḤ AL-JĀMIʿ AL-ṢAGHĪR

Authors

  • Dr Mohamed Ibrahim Mohammad el Halawani Associate Professor, Al-Madinah International University (MEDIU), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4114-146X
  • Dr Mohammed Abdullah Ali Giyash Assistant Professor, Al-Madinah International University (MEDIU), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Muhammad Rashid PhD Scholar, Al-Madinah International University (MEDIU), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3911-9792

Keywords:

Al-Suyuti, Al-Manawi, Fayd al-Qadeer, Al-Jami' al-Saghir, Hadith Criticism.

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a detailed and analytical study of Imam Al-Manawi's critiques on Imam Al-Suyuti in his book Fayd al-Qadeer. In particular, Al-Manawi highlights issues related to attributing hadiths to sources outside of the two Sahihs (Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim), even though these hadiths are indeed found within them. Such critical analysis is of paramount importance, as it contributes to enhancing the accuracy of scholars in dealing with hadith sources and refining their judgments.

The study presents multiple examples of these critiques, seeking to understand the methodology that Al-Manawi employed in his evaluations and to identify the instances where he believed that Al-Suyuti may have overstepped the bounds of authentication or misattributed certain hadiths. This research relies on a meticulous review of primary hadith sources, such as Al-Jami' al-Saghir by Al-Suyuti and Fayd al-Qadeer by Al-Manawi, and includes a thorough analysis of the chains of transmission and the conditions of narrators in order to arrive at a scholarly judgment on the hadiths.

This study also emphasizes the significance of hadith criticism in forming an accurate understanding of the Prophetic traditions, ensuring avoidance of weak or unauthenticated narrations. Additionally, the research highlights the impact of such critiques on the science of hadith and proves beneficial for the preparation of studies and research related to the assessment and evaluation of Prophetic hadiths.

References

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 750).

Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī. (n.d.). Tārīkh Baghdād (Vol. 9, p. 378).

Al-Suyūṭī. (1st ed.). Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥuffāẓ (Vol. 1, p. 59).

Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī. (n.d.). Tārīkh Baghdād (Vol. 9, p. 378).

Al-Dhahabī. (n.d.). Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā’ (Vol. 14, p. 171).

Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī. (n.d.). Tārīkh Baghdād (Vol. 9, p. 378).

Al-Suyūṭī. (1st ed.). Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥuffāẓ (Vol. 1, p. 59).

Al-Dhahabī. (n.d.). Siyar A‘lām al-Nubalā’ (Vol. 14, p. 168).

Al-Albānī. (1st ed.). Al-Ḍa‘īfa (Vol. 24, p. 321).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 534).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 1056).

Al-Bājī. (1st ed.). Al-Ta‘dīl wa al-Tajrīḥ (Vol. 3, p. 1389).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 734).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 534).

Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr. (n.d.). Al-Istī‘āb (Vol. 3, p. 933, No. 1588); Ibn al-Athīr. (n.d.). Usd al-Ghāba (Vol. 3, p. 291, No. 3037); Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Al-Iṣāba (Vol. 4, p. 121, No. 4799).

Al-Bukhārī. (3rd ed.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 6, p. 171, Ḥadīth 4949).

Muslim. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 4, p. 2040, Ḥadīth 2647).

Al-Nasā’ī. (1st ed.). Al-Kubrā (Vol. 2, p. 111).

Al-Ṭabarānī. (n.d.). Al-Kabīr (Vol. 13-14, p. 51).

Al-Ṭabarānī. (n.d.). Al-Kabīr (Vol. 5, p. 144).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 225).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 534).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 983).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 166).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 351).

Ibn Khaldūn. (n.d.). Al-‘Ibar (Vol. 1, p. 432).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 320).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 1037).

Ibn Ma‘īn. (1st ed.). Tārīkh (Vol. 2, p. 310); Al-Madīnī. (1st ed.). Su’ālāt Ibn Abī Shayba (No. 182); Khalīfa ibn Khayyāṭ. (n.d.). Tārīkh (p. 434); Al-Bukhārī. (n.d.). Al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr (Vol. 5, No. 300); Al-Bukhārī. (n.d.). Al-Tārīkh al-Ṣaghīr (Vol. 2, p. 77); Al-‘Ijlī. Thiqāt (p. 29); Al-‘Uqaylī. (1st ed.). Al-Ḍu‘afā’ al-Kabīr (p. 102); Ibn Abī Ḥātim. (n.d.). Al-Jarḥ wa al-Ta‘dīl (Vol. 5, No. 335); Ibn Ḥibbān. Thiqāt (Vol. 7, p. 12); Ibn Manjawayh. (n.d.). Rijāl Muslim (p. 92); Al-Dhahabī. (2nd ed.). Dīwān al-Ḍu‘afā’ (No. 2182); Al-Dhahabī. (n.d.). Al-Mīzān (Vol. 2, No. 4352); Ibn Ḥajar. (n.d.). Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb (Vol. 2, p. 149); Al-Dhahabī. (1st ed.). Man Tukullima Fīhi (p. 19); Mizzī. (n.d.). Tahdhīb al-Kamāl (Vol. 2, p. 276); Ibn Ḥajar. (n.d.). Tahdhīb al-Tahdhīb (Vol. 5, p. 239); Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (Vol. 1, p. 420); Al-Khazrajī. (5th ed.). Khulāṣa (Vol. 2, No. 3536).

Al-Mizzī. (n.d.). Tahdhīb al-Kamāl (Vol. 10, p. 127, No. 2141); Al-Bukhārī. (n.d.). Al-Tārīkh al-Kabīr (Vol. 4, p. 111, No. 2139); Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 226, No. 2169).

Al-Bukhārī. (3rd ed.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 9, p. 95, Ḥadīth 7290).

Muslim. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 1, p. 539, Ḥadīth 781).

Ibn Mājah. (n.d.). Sunan (Vol. 2, p. 728).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 320).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 538).

Ibn Manjawayh. (n.d.). Rijāl Muslim (Vol. 2, p. 231).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 90).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 534).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 601).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 913).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 138).

Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Taqrīb al-Tahdhīb (p. 654).

Ibn al-Athīr. (n.d.). Usd al-Ghāba (Vol. 3, p. 457, No. 3334); Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr. (n.d.). Al-Istī‘āb (Vol. 4, p. 1768); Ibn Ḥajar. (1st ed.). Al-Iṣāba (Vol. 7, p. 348, No. 10680).

Al-Bukhārī. (3rd ed.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 7, p. 96, Ḥadīth 5530); Muslim. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ (Vol. 3, p. 1533, Ḥadīth 1932).

02 Arabic Final PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS January March 2025 Vol 05 Issue 01 Citation Page

Downloads

Published

16-02-2025

How to Cite

Mohamed Ibrahim Mohammad el Halawani, Mohammed Abdullah Ali Giyash, & Muhammad Rashid. (2025). نماذج من التعقبات الخاصة بعزو الأحاديث لمصادر خارج الصحيحين في كتاب "فيض القدير شرح الجامع الصغير": EXAMPLES OF SPECIFIC CRITIQUES REGARDING THE ATTRIBUTION OF HADITHS TO SOURCES OUTSIDE THE TWO SAHIHS IN THE BOOK FAYḌ AL-QADĪR SHARḤ AL-JĀMIʿ AL-ṢAGHĪR. PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences), 5(01), 07-19. https://pakistanislamicus.com/index.php/home/article/view/239