EFFECTIVENESS OF STEM APPROACH ON ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
Keywords:
STEM Approach, Instructional Methods, Elementary School Students, Solomon Four-Group Design, Critical Thinking Skills.Abstract
Developing critical thinking is a fundamental goal of effective education, which aims to cultivate informed citizens and a skilled workforce, ultimately contributing to a wiser nation. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) approach in enhancing critical thinking skills among elementary school students. Utilizing an adapted Watson-Glaser critical thinking skills appraisal, this research examines a representative sample of eighth-grade public sector school students, acquired through simple random sampling. A 2x2 factorial experimental design, grounded in the Solomon Four-Group approach, was employed to rigorously evaluate the intervention, involving 184 students divided into control and experimental groups through random assignment. The experimental groups received STEM-based instruction, while the control groups continued with traditional teaching methods. Standardized critical thinking assessments were administered as pretests, posttests, and retention posttests. Quantitative analysis revealed significant improvements in critical thinking skills among students in the experimental groups. From the pretest (M = 45.32, SD = 4.15) to the posttest (M = 63.47, SD = 5.03), experimental groups exhibited marked increases in the critical thinking scores, and these gains were sustained in the retention posttest (M = 61.89, SD = 4.72). In contrast, there were hardly any changes in the control groups, with the pretest (M = 4.87, SD = 4.23) and posttest (M = 46.12, SD = 4.33). When compared to traditional approaches, the STEM approach, as evidence by the highly significant interaction effect F(1, 180) = 36.53, P <0.05) with the effect size (Cohen’s d – 1.52). Independent analysis of the main effects of the pretest and treatment was F(1, 180) = 40.28, P <0.05) and F(1, 180) = 576.21, P <0.05) respectively.
References
Akgündüz, D. (2017). Leave STEM Alone: Errors and Suggestions Made on Behalf of Stem in Turkey. Https://Www.Egitimpedia. Com/Stemi-rahat-birakin-turkiyede-stem-adina-yapilan-hatalar-veoneriler [Last Accessed on 2021 Sep 21].
Bal, A. P., & Bedir, S. G. (2021). Examining teachers’ views on STEM education. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(3), 327-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i3.3650
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5-6), 23-37.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Çakır, Z., & Altun Yalçın, S. (2021). The effect of Montessori approach based STEM activities on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards science and science teaching. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(35), 1895-1924. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.831879
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educ. Leader., 43, 44-48.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 1, 1-23.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Psychology Press.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. National Academies Press.
IBM. (2012). Creativity is generally defined in the public and private sectors as encompassing critical and creative thinking; “IBM CEO Study: Command & Control Meets Collaboration,” IBM, May 22, 2012,. http://www.ibm.com/news/ca/en/2012/05/22/q198321g11062s84.html.
Imran.Gunduz. (2023, April 7). Top 10 Benefits of STEM Education - Twin Science. Twin Science. https://www.twinscience.com/en/teacher-tips/top-10-benefits-of-stem-education/ IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. (1933). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 231(694–706), 289–337. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1933.0009.L
Kek, M. Y. C. A., & Huijser, H. (2011). The power of problem‐based learning in developing critical thinking skills: preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501074
Khalid, A., &., & Khan, F. (2021). The impact of STEM education on academic achievement: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(2), 150-169.
Kohn, A. (2004). Challenging Students and How to Have More of Them. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 3, 184–194.
Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action. Congressional Research Service Report, 35, 1-38.
Lai, E.R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Pearson’s Research Reports.
National Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12. Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (Washington DC: The National Academies Press).
OECD (2018). The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The miniature guide to critical thinking: Concepts and tools. Dillon Beach, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). Critical thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life. Prentice Hall.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Robert, H., & Ennis,. (1996). Critical Thinking. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996).
Roberts, A., & Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM instructional strategies to design and technology curriculum. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(4), 21-28
Roberts, A., & Cantu, D. (2012). The Role of STEM Education in Developing 21st Century Skills: A comparative Analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 123-135.
Solomon, R. L. (1949). An extension of control group design. Psychological Bulletin, 46(2), 137-150.
Sornsakda, S., Suksringarm, P., & Singseewo, A. (2009). Effects of Learning Environmental Education Using the 7E-Learning Cycle with Metacognitive Techniques and the Teacher’s Handbook Approaches on Learning Achievement, Integrated Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking of Mathayomsuksa 5 Students with Different Learning Achievement Pakistan. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 297–305.
Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices, and outcomes.
Stuart, L., & Dahm, E. (1999). 21st Century Skills for 21st Century Fobs. New York: Federal Publications, Cornell University.
Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A Project to Identify the Missing Components. Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon.
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020.
Yenilmez, & Ersoy. (2008). Opinions of Mathematics Teacher Candidates Toward Applying 7E Instructinal Model on Computer Aided Instruction Environments International. Journal of Instruction, 11, 49–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PAKISTAN ISLAMICUS (An International Journal of Islamic & Social Sciences)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.